Are you in favor of the proposed amendment to repeal Amendment 2 of the decision of the Supreme Court?
The City Council passed an Act arms control that was almost as restrictive as the old, in Washington DC as follows .*; now simply have a firearm in the Capitol City of Nations, a resident will be five (5 *) course in two hours. Re-registration of all firearms three (3 *) years. Undergoing invasive background check every six (6 *) years. Pass a 20 question multiple choice test designed by bureaucrats convoluted basis in the law of the city. Pay a registration fee. They have all the guns undergo to go ballistic … Your thoughts, concerns and opinions about the recent attack on the 2nd Amendment again in Washington, DC .*… D * Alex, and fencer 1 = A + CIH (RET) and Jim R.. A + ion, Mark M, sayHello … and patriot .* A + .*
The second amendment can not get clearer. Let's look again in the details … "the right of people to celebrate and bear arms shall not be infringed" might miss something. consider the meaning of some of these words. Something has changed in the dictionary. Well .. NO = adv. No way, no how. Used to express negation, denial, denial or prohibition: "No I "." Maybe not. "(Dictionary.com) violated = transgress or exceed the limits, to violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent. (Dictionary.com) seems quite clear and concise. Maybe it's time for the American people to understand a bit of history in this matter. It is important to understand that there is a reason the founding father of paste this first amendment have been so categorical and respected. These are inalienable rights. Let's see: INALIENABLE = Unable to be transferred, assigned or transferred (dictionary.com) This means that anyone, not even Congress has the power to change these rights. Perhaps we should consider other leaders such as Hitler, Stalin and Mao, which prevailed in a populist without weapons. The main point is that the Constitution is full of checks and balances. They intended to keep the country free and secure a continuing balance power. Congress President of the Supreme Court would be an example. A well armed military – a well-armed militia – a well-armed population. Listen, if you do not believe me, then maybe instead take a look at what the founders had to say … "No free man shall be forever prohibited the use of weapons." Thomas Jefferson "A well regulated militia formed, when in fact the same people … and all men are able to bear arms. "Richard Henry Lee" … to disarm the people – that was the best and most effective to enslave them. "George Mason" Before an army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are, in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in the United States can not enforce unjust laws by the sword, because they are armed with the whole body of people, and constitute a force superior to any group of troops can be scheduled under any pretext, grew up in America, "Noah Webster" The Constitution shall not be construed …. to prevent people United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms "Samuel Adams
Supreme Court Rules on DC Gun Ban